Home

In this digital age, any person can make a post, have the potential to go viral, and have his/her fifteen minutes of fame (pardon the cliché). With more than 1 billion people on Facebook and over 400 million people on Instagram, there is no question social media has the capability of reaching millions of people per second. However, not everyone uses social media with the best intentions.

Recently in the news, Czech model “Christina from Moravia” tried to blackmail NHL player Jaromir Jagr with a scandalous selfie. She threatened to post a after-sex picture if he did not pay her $2000. He said, “I don’t care,” and she released the picture online.

In a separate case, Czech art group Ztohoven replaced the President’s flag at Prague Castle with a large pair of red underpants. On Facebook, they explained they “hoisted a flag for a man [who] was not ashamed of anything.”

People post online in social media sites to get attention and express their opinions. Would you still post on Facebook if no one likes, comments, or shares your content? With the ability to make your words and pictures appear in front of hundreds to millions of people, people are in the perfect position to abuse this power. Christina utilized social media for blackmail and Ztohoven used social media to showcase their misdemeanor.

8468788107_255777d512_z

Image courtesy of Flickr user mkhmarketing

My question is whether there should be limits to our freedom of speech online. In America, we have the First Amendment, and the Czech Republic has freedom of speech and press as well. However, there are restrictions on publications that infringe on individuals’ rights and morality. If all it takes is to have one person download your post to be considered published, then both Christina and Ztohoven are publishers. In my opinion, they have both attempted to damage the reputation of their respective targets without the intention of posting for “public interest.”

To my knowledge and research, Christina and Ztohoven are not in trouble or being sued for defamation. 3 members of Ztohoven, whom placed the underpants, have been arrested. However, they are not charged for posting on social media. Both of these actions can justifiably be deemed as inappropriate uses of social media. There are not many regulations and laws set to protect people on social media because this concept has only been recently magnified, during the past decade, without many precedents.

I think social media is a fantastic platform to reach millions of people to discuss important news and updates. However, using it to promote negative behavior deserves consequences. In 2012, a hacker who leaked nude photos of Scarlett Johansson is jailed for 10 years. I believe more cases, especially cases affiliated with non-public figures, should be reviewed and made as an example for people to stop committing immoral acts on social media. Due to the fact that censorship is forbidden in Czech Republic, this freedom should not be abused.

In my opinion, the consequences for what we say and do offline should be applied online as well. Christina blackmailed Jaromir online and Ztohoven easily publicized their wrongdoing. These actions would not be taken as lightly if they were to happen offline. Internet security and internet laws need to be more defined and enforced in order to prevent users’ free rein to post and spread whatever they want. In addition to enforcement, I think we need to increase cyber-education. Men, women, and children need to understand the repercussions of negative online behavior. Until then, evil Czech models and Czech jokesters will continue to roam freely on our social media sites.

8540717756_396867dbab_z

Image Courtesy of Flickr User mkhmarketing

Feature Image Courtesy of Shutterstock User xtock

Advertisements

One thought on “Czech Model and Czech Underpants?

  1. In terms of crimes being committed on Social Media, I completely agree that there should be steps taken to enforce fitting punishment, and to prevent further crimes from being committed. In your post however, you make an important distinction when you say “I believe more cases, especially cases affiliated with non-public figures, should be reviewed and made as an example for people to stop committing immoral acts on social media.” The key word in this sentence is ‘immoral’. While both the cases you discuss were almost inarguably immoral, I do not believe they were illegal, which is an important distinction which needs to be kept in mind by the court, legal system, and citizens of not just the Czech Republic, but any country, when dealing with the world of social media.
    In these two cases you discuss, I have to side with the actions that were taken, and not taken, against both Christina and the Ztohoven, due to the fact that the acts they committed online do not appear to be illegal. Illegal acts were in fact committed offline by the Ztohoven, which were rightly punished by criminal law. The post on Facebook was not a threat of future harm, but more of a confession. The group was not advocating for violence, they merely confessed an illegal act they had already committed, for which they were rightly punished. Though protecting the reputations of others is without a doubt important, protecting the rights of free speech is also important, particularly in cases in which what has been said might be mean, stupid (in the case of confessing your own crime), or immoral but not necessarily illegal.
    A point you made in your post, which I think is extremely valid and crucial to solving some of the problems associated with social media in our society, is the need for what you term “cyber education”. I think you are completely right when you say that we need to increase people’s awareness, in countries around the world, in terms of the potential consequences certain actions on social media can bring about. Along with increased education, I think people should also take to heart your point about social media being an attention seeking mechanism, and that these online trouble makers might be less likely to post harmful things if they didn’t think it would warrant them some kind of public attention. In this regard, it is the culture in which social media exists, rather than social media itself that needs to experience a fundamental change.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s